robot: be used today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bender
Weight: 0.57
, sentry
Weight: 0.39
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used today 1.00
is are used today 0.89
be used 0.86
be used for 0.86
be used make 0.82
be used help 0.81
be used in world 0.80
be are used 0.80
is are used 0.79
be used in real world 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer mouse, be used for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(computer mouse, be used for)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(computer mouse, be used for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(robot, be used today)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(robot, be used in world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(robot, be used in real world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(robot, be used in real world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(robot, be used in real world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(robot, be used in world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(robot, be used in real world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(robot, be used in world)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(robot, be used in world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(robot, be used today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(robot, be used today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(robot, be used today)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(computer mouse, be used for)