role: be more defined now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.67
, snow queen
Weight: 0.59
, reconnaissance
Weight: 0.58
, tester
Weight: 0.54
, tiny tim
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more defined now 1.00
be defined now 0.97
be more defined 0.97
be defined 0.93
be defined in economy 0.85
be defined in traditional economy 0.83
is more important 0.77
be more important than management 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(role, be more defined now)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(role, be defined)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(role, be defined)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(role, be more defined)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(role, be defined now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(role, be defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(role, be more defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(role, be defined now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(role, be defined now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(role, be defined in economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(role, be more defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(role, be defined now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(role, be more defined)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(role, be defined in traditional economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(role, be defined in traditional economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(role, be defined in economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(role, be defined in economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(role, be defined in traditional economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(role, be defined in economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, be defined in traditional economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(role, is more important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(role, be defined)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(role, is more important)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(role, is more important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(role, is more important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(role, be more defined now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(role, be more defined now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)