role: is model

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.67
, snow queen
Weight: 0.59
, reconnaissance
Weight: 0.58
, tester
Weight: 0.54
, tiny tim
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is model 1.00
model to people 0.94
model important in childcare 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(factor, is model)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(role, is model)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(factor, is model)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(factor, is model)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(factor, is model)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(role, is model)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(role, is model)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(role, model to people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(role, model to people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(role, model to people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(role, model to people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, model important in childcare)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(role, model important in childcare)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(role, model important in childcare)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(role, model important in childcare)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(role, is model)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(role, is model)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factor, is model)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(role, is model)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factor, is model)