role: model to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.67
, snow queen
Weight: 0.59
, reconnaissance
Weight: 0.58
, tester
Weight: 0.54
, tiny tim
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
model to people 1.00
is model 0.94
model important in childcare 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(factor, is model)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(role, model to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(factor, is model)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(factor, is model)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(factor, is model)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(role, model to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(role, model to people)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(role, is model)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(role, is model)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(role, is model)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(role, model important in childcare)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(role, model important in childcare)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(role, model important in childcare)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(role, model important in childcare)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(role, is model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(role, model to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(role, model to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factor, is model)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(role, model to people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factor, is model)