rugby: be important to new zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.68
, game
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, team
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cricket
Weight: 0.37
, football team
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to new zealand 1.00
be important to zealand 0.98
be popular in new zealand 0.97
be popular in zealand 0.95
be popular in australia 0.80
be very popular in australia 0.79
be popular in uk 0.77
is uk 0.76
die in australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cricket, be popular in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rugby, die in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rugby, die in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(rugby, die in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rugby, die in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rugby, is uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to zealand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rugby, is uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rugby, is uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rugby, is uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be popular in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be important to new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)