rugby: be popular in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.68
, game
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, team
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings cricket
Weight: 0.37
, football team
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in uk 1.00
is uk 0.95
be popular in australia 0.87
be popular in zealand 0.84
be very popular in australia 0.84
be popular in new zealand 0.83
be popular in france 0.82
be popular in georgia 0.81
be popular in argentina 0.80
be popular in south of france 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cricket, be popular in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cricket, be popular in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rugby, is uk)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rugby, is uk)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rugby, is uk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in france)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in france)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rugby, be popular in south of france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in south of france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in south of france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rugby, is uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in zealand)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be very popular in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in new zealand)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in georgia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in argentina)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in south of france)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rugby, be popular in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cricket, be popular in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rugby, be popular in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)