ruler: were chosen in babylon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prince
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.58
, object
Weight: 0.58
Siblings king
Weight: 0.72
, tyrant
Weight: 0.56
, napoleon
Weight: 0.55
, kingdom
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were chosen in babylon 1.00
were chosen 0.86
were chosen in greece 0.81
were selected 0.81
were chosen in ancient greece 0.80
were chosen in china 0.79
were chosen in ancient china 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ruler, were selected)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ruler, were selected)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ruler, were selected)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)