ruler: were chosen in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prince
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.58
, object
Weight: 0.58
Siblings king
Weight: 0.72
, tyrant
Weight: 0.56
, napoleon
Weight: 0.55
, kingdom
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were chosen in china 1.00
were chosen in ancient china 0.94
were chosen 0.84
were selected 0.79
were chosen in babylon 0.79
were chosen in greece 0.78
were chosen in ancient greece 0.78
were chosen in ancient governments of mesopotamia 0.76
were chosen in ancient governments 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ruler, were selected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments of mesopotamia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in ancient china)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ruler, were selected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments of mesopotamia)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments of mesopotamia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in ancient greece)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ruler, were selected)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in ancient governments of mesopotamia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)