ruler: were selected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prince
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.58
, object
Weight: 0.58
Siblings king
Weight: 0.72
, tyrant
Weight: 0.56
, napoleon
Weight: 0.55
, kingdom
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were selected 1.00
were chosen 0.94
were chosen in babylon 0.81
were chosen in china 0.79
were chosen in greece 0.77
were chosen in governments of mesopotamia 0.76
were chosen in governments 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ruler, were selected)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in governments of mesopotamia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in governments)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ruler, were chosen in governments of mesopotamia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in governments of mesopotamia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in china)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in babylon)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in governments)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in greece)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen in governments)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen in governments)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen in governments of mesopotamia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were selected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ruler, were selected)