safety: be in construction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents protection
Weight: 0.63
, value
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hazard
Weight: 0.59
, safety glass
Weight: 0.36
, health insurance
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33
, integrity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in construction 1.00
be in construction important 0.97
be important on construction site 0.90
be very important in construction 0.90
be important to building contractor 0.79
be important to project 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(safety, be in construction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(value, be important to project)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(health, be important on construction site)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(safety, be in construction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(health, be important on construction site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(health, be important on construction site)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(safety, be in construction)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(safety, be very important in construction)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(safety, be very important in construction)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(safety, be very important in construction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(safety, be important on construction site)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(safety, be very important in construction)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(safety, be important on construction site)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(safety, be important to building contractor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(safety, be important on construction site)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(safety, be important to building contractor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(safety, be important on construction site)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(safety, be important to building contractor)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(safety, be important to building contractor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(safety, be in construction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(safety, be in construction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(health, be important on construction site)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(safety, be in construction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)