sale: have important to industry management tools

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important to industry management tools 1.00
be important to business 0.79
be important in business 0.79
be important to company 0.77
be used as metric for companies 0.76
be important for growth of business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(occupation, be important for growth of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sale, have important to industry management tools)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(occupation, be important for growth of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(occupation, be important for growth of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to company)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be used as metric for companies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(occupation, be important for growth of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(revenue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(revenue, be used as metric for companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(revenue, be used as metric for companies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sale, have important to industry management tools)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sale, be important to business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sale, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sale, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sale, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sale, have important to industry management tools)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(occupation, be important for growth of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(revenue, be used as metric for companies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to company)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(revenue, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sale, have important to industry management tools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(occupation, be important for growth of business)