sale: have regressive taxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conversion
Weight: 0.63
, disposition
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings auction
Weight: 0.68
, revenue
Weight: 0.61
, purchase
Weight: 0.59
, clearance
Weight: 0.57
, free
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
have regressive taxes 1.00
have called regressive taxes taxes 0.99
have called taxes taxes 0.90
have taxes 0.90
tax 0.86
lowering taxes 0.81
be raised through taxes 0.79
have taxed commissions 0.77
be from texas gasoline tax 0.77
have taxed high commissions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be raised through taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(revenue, lowering taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(revenue, be raised through taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(revenue, be raised through taxes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sale, have regressive taxes)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sale, have called regressive taxes taxes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sale, tax)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sale, tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sale, tax)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sale, tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sale, have regressive taxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(revenue, lowering taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(revenue, be raised through taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sale, have regressive taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(revenue, be from texas gasoline tax)