san francisco: have earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
have earthquakes 1.00
get earthquakes 0.99
have many earthquakes 0.98
be at risk of earthquakes 0.93
be prone to earthquakes 0.93
be vulnerable to earthquakes 0.92
be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly 0.92
be more vulnerable to earthquakes 0.91
be susceptible to earthquakes 0.90
be at risk of earthquake 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(seattle, have earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, have earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, get earthquakes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, have many earthquakes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mexico city, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(seattle, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(seattle, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(vancouver, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(vancouver, have earthquakes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(vancouver, get earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(vancouver, get earthquakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(vancouver, have many earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vancouver, have many earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have many earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(san francisco, have many earthquakes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have many earthquakes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(san francisco, be prone to earthquakes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san francisco, have many earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(seattle, have earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vancouver, get earthquakes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vancouver, have earthquakes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(vancouver, have many earthquakes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(los angeles, have earthquakes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes brainly)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexico city, have earthquakes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be susceptible to earthquakes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexico city, be vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(san francisco, have earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mexico city, be prone to earthquakes)