sandwich: be better in space

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better in space 1.00
is good for 0.76
seem to better 0.75
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sandwich, be better in space)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sandwich, be better in space)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(sandwich, be better in space)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, seem to better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(sandwich, seem to better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sandwich, seem to better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, seem to better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sandwich, be better in space)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sandwich, be better in space)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)