sauce: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot sauce
Weight: 0.73
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.69
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, soup
Weight: 0.63
, liquid
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tabasco sauce
Weight: 0.43
, gumbo
Weight: 0.36
, tabasco
Weight: 0.36
, gravy
Weight: 0.36
, stew
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
is good for 0.82
taste good 0.77
be bad for keto 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(soup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soy sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tabasco, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tabasco, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gumbo, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gravy, is good for)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(soup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soy sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tabasco, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tabasco, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tabasco, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tabasco, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gumbo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gumbo, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(gravy, is good for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gravy, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sauce, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sauce, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sauce, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sauce, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sauce, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sauce, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(soy sauce, taste good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tabasco, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tabasco, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gumbo, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tabasco sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gravy, is good for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soy sauce, be bad for keto)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(soy sauce, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)