scissors: cut in straight line

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, necessity
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
Siblings razor blade
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, butter knife
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cut in straight line 1.00
cut in line 0.93
cut 0.84
cut things 0.80
cutting through alfoil 0.79
be poor cutting 0.76
cut paper 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(scissors, cut in straight line)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(scissors, cut things)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(scissors, cut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut paper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(scissors, cut paper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(scissors, cut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scissors, cut paper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut in line)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut things)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in line)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut paper)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut in line)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(scissors, cut in line)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(scissors, cut)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scissors, cut things)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cutting through alfoil)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(scissors, be poor cutting)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(scissors, cut in straight line)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(scissors, cut in straight line) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scissors, cut in straight line)