scotch: be better than whiskey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than whiskey 1.00
be more expensive than whiskey 0.96
be different from whiskey 0.95
be more expensive than bourbon 0.89
is aged longer than bourbon 0.85
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.83
be called scotch 0.82
be aged in bourbon barrels 0.81
give beer belly 0.76
be better in glass 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(drink, be better in glass)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(drink, be better in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drink, be better in glass)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, give beer belly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(drink, be better in glass)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(drinking beer, give beer belly)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, give beer belly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(scotch, be called scotch)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(scotch, be called scotch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scotch, be called scotch)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be called scotch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be better in glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drinking beer, give beer belly)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be better in glass)