scotch: be more expensive than whiskey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than whiskey 1.00
be better than whiskey 0.96
be more expensive than bourbon 0.92
be different from whiskey 0.92
is aged longer than bourbon 0.84
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.84
be called scotch 0.81
be aged in bourbon barrels 0.79
be expensive in pubs 0.76
be more refreshing than warm drinks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drink, be expensive in pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(spirit, be expensive in pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(spirit, be expensive in pubs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drink, be expensive in pubs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(spirit, be expensive in pubs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in pubs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drink, be expensive in pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(whiskey, be called scotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(spirit, be expensive in pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bourbon, be different from whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bourbon, be different from whiskey)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(scotch tape, be called scotch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be called scotch)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(scotch, be called scotch)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(scotch, be called scotch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than bourbon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(scotch, be aged in bourbon barrels)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be better than whiskey)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(scotch, be called scotch)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be different from whiskey)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is aged longer than bourbon)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be called scotch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(spirit, be expensive in pubs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in pubs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vodka, be better than whiskey)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be called scotch)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bourbon, be different from whiskey)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whiskey, be called scotch)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(spirit, be expensive in pubs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more expensive than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in pubs)