screen: work for tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents display
Weight: 0.62
, graphic
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table
Weight: 0.62
, monitor
Weight: 0.60
, retina
Weight: 0.54
, touchpad
Weight: 0.52
, blowjob
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
work for tv 1.00
be more expensive than tv 0.86
be green on netflix 0.78
look better than tvs 0.77
be better than tvs 0.77
be better than tvs for gaming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look better than tvs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(monitor, look better than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(monitor, look better than tvs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(screen, work for tv)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(screen, be green on netflix)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(screen, be green on netflix)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(screen, be green on netflix)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(screen, be green on netflix)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(screen, work for tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(monitor, look better than tvs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)