monitor: be more expensive than tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than tv 1.00
be more expensive than than tv 0.99
be better than tv 0.93
be more expensive than tvs 0.90
be much cheaper than tvs 0.87
cost more than tvs 0.87
be cheaper than tvs 0.86
work for tv 0.86
be better than tvs 0.84
be more expensive than televisions 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(screen, work for tv)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(screen, work for tv)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(screen, work for tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(monitor, cost more than tvs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(monitor, cost more than tvs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(monitor, cost more than tvs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(monitor, cost more than tvs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(screen, work for tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(screen, work for tv)