monitor: be more expensive than televisions

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.63 , computer hardware Weight: 0.62 , screen Weight: 0.60 , interface Weight: 0.59
Siblings	computer monitor Weight: 0.39 , electronic device Weight: 0.34 , laptop computer Weight: 0.34 , network device Weight: 0.33 , cooling device Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than televisions	1.00
work on televisions	0.93
be more expensive than tvs	0.89
be much cheaper than tvs	0.86
cost more than tvs	0.85
be cheaper than tvs	0.85
be better than tvs	0.84
be more expensive than than tv	0.84
be more expensive than tv	0.83
look better than tvs	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(screen, work on televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(screen, work on televisions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(screen, work on televisions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(screen, work on televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(monitor, cost more than tvs)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(monitor, look better than tvs)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(monitor, cost more than tvs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(monitor, cost more than tvs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(monitor, look better than tvs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(monitor, look better than tvs)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(monitor, cost more than tvs)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(monitor, look better than tvs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(screen, work on televisions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tv)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(monitor, be more expensive than televisions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(screen, work on televisions)