seattle: be better than portland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than portland 1.00
get less rain than austin 0.82
be better than vancouver 0.82
be warmer than denver 0.81
be warmer than chicago 0.80
be bigger than tacoma 0.78
be warmer than york 0.77
be warmer than new york 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than portland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be warmer than new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(seattle, be better than portland)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than vancouver)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(seattle, be better than vancouver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(seattle, be better than vancouver)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than vancouver)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than new york)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(seattle, get less rain than austin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(seattle, be bigger than tacoma)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(seattle, be better than portland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer than new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(seattle, be better than portland)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer than new york)