seattle: be warmer than chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.66
, san francisco
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, port
Weight: 0.59
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, san diego
Weight: 0.36
, san jose
Weight: 0.36
, chicago
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be warmer than chicago 1.00
be warmer than denver 0.91
be warmer than york 0.89
be warmer than francisco 0.89
be warmer than new york 0.88
be warmer than san francisco 0.83
get less rain than austin 0.81
be better than portland 0.80
be better than vancouver 0.79
be bigger than tacoma 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than francisco)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(san francisco, be warmer than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(san jose, be warmer than francisco)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(san jose, be warmer than san francisco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than denver)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than san francisco)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(san jose, be warmer than francisco)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(san jose, be warmer than san francisco)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer than new york)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(seattle, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(los angeles, be warmer than san francisco)