security guard: wear suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.77
, employee
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.68
, worker
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bouncer
Weight: 0.47
, prison guard
Weight: 0.37
, state police
Weight: 0.35
, police
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear suits 1.00
wear suits with dress shoes 0.94
wear black 0.83
wear uniforms 0.83
wear sunglasses 0.81
wear badges 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(police officer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear black)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, wear sunglasses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(police, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(police officer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(police officer, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(police, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bouncer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bouncer, wear black)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bouncer, wear sunglasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(bouncer, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(security guard, wear suits)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits with dress shoes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear black)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security guard, wear sunglasses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(security guard, wear badges)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(security guard, wear black)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(security guard, wear black)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(security guard, wear badges)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear badges)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(security guard, wear black)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear uniforms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear badges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security guard, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police officer, wear sunglasses)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bouncer, wear sunglasses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bouncer, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(police officer, wear black)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(security guard, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(police officer, wear sunglasses)