sega: gain market share from nintendo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.55
, publisher
Weight: 0.49
, client
Weight: 0.49
, system
Weight: 0.47
, sony
Weight: 0.46
Siblings nintendo
Weight: 0.33
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33
, mitsubishi
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.32
, philips
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
gain market share from nintendo 1.00
be better than nintendo 0.84
is nintendo 0.84
be part of nintendo 0.84
be much more superior to nintendo 0.82
be better than nintendo switch 0.81
is nintendo switch 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sega, is nintendo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(sega, is nintendo)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sega, is nintendo switch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sega, be better than nintendo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo switch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sega, is nintendo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(sega, be better than nintendo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(sega, be better than nintendo)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sega, be part of nintendo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sega, be better than nintendo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sega, be much more superior to nintendo)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(sega, is nintendo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sega, gain market share from nintendo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sega, gain market share from nintendo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sega, gain market share from nintendo)