senior: be in poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents veteran
Weight: 0.62
, group
Weight: 0.59
, division
Weight: 0.55
, leader
Weight: 0.54
, high school
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junior
Weight: 0.59
, leadership
Weight: 0.31
, committee
Weight: 0.31
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, school district
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in poverty 1.00
live in poverty 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(veteran, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(senior, be in poverty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(veteran, be in poverty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(veteran, be in poverty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(veteran, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(senior, be in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(senior, be in poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(senior, live in poverty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(senior, live in poverty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(senior, live in poverty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(senior, live in poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(senior, be in poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(senior, be in poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(veteran, be in poverty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(senior, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(veteran, be in poverty)