senior: live in poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents veteran
Weight: 0.62
, group
Weight: 0.59
, division
Weight: 0.55
, leader
Weight: 0.54
, high school
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junior
Weight: 0.59
, leadership
Weight: 0.31
, committee
Weight: 0.31
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, school district
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in poverty 1.00
be in poverty 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(veteran, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(senior, live in poverty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(veteran, be in poverty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(veteran, be in poverty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(veteran, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(senior, live in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(senior, live in poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(senior, be in poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(senior, be in poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(senior, be in poverty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(senior, be in poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(senior, live in poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(senior, live in poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(veteran, be in poverty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(senior, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(veteran, be in poverty)