sense: was popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents common sense
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feeling
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sight
Weight: 0.64
, pursuit
Weight: 0.49
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, fairness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular 1.00
was popular during 1700s 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sense, was popular)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)