sense: was popular during 1700s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents common sense
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, feeling
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sight
Weight: 0.64
, pursuit
Weight: 0.49
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, empathy
Weight: 0.34
, fairness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular during 1700s 1.00
was popular 0.92
be important in early years 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(principle, be important in early years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(common sense, was popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(principle, be important in early years)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common sense, was popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(principle, be important in early years)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(common sense, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(principle, be important in early years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(sense, was popular during 1700s)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sense, was popular)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sense, was popular)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sense, was popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(principle, be important in early years)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular during 1700s)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(common sense, was popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(sense, was popular during 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(principle, be important in early years)