shake: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, ice cream
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.51
, show
Weight: 0.50
Siblings rattle
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, rip
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shake, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shake, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shake, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(shake, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(shake, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(shake, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shake, has quality better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shake, has quality better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shake, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shake, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(shake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)