sharing: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, value
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, service station
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, cooperation
Weight: 0.31
, chat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is damn hard 0.86
be by parts hard 0.82
is difficult 0.82
tend harder 0.77
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sharing, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, tend harder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sharing, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, tend harder)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(service, tend harder)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cooperation, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(integration, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(integration, is damn hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sharing, is hard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, tend harder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sharing, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cooperation, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cooperation, is hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(integration, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(integration, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(integration, is damn hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(integration, is damn hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(integration, be by parts hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cooperation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cooperation, is good thing)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sharing, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sharing, is difficult)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(sharing, is difficult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sharing, is difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sharing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, tend harder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooperation, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cooperation, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(integration, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(integration, be by parts hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, is hard)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sharing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, tend harder)