shark: attack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, fish
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, bull shark
Weight: 0.83
, great white shark
Weight: 0.79
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.76
, manta ray
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack 1.00
attack people 0.94
attack humans 0.88
attack instead of animals 0.84
attack boats 0.79
attack more then girls boy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(predator, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shark, attack)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shark, attack)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(predator, attack)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, attack people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, attack people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(predator, attack)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, attack humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(predator, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(shark, attack)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tiger shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(shark, attack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, attack people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great white shark, attack people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(great white shark, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(great white shark, attack humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(shark, attack)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shark, attack people)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(shark, attack people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(shark, attack people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shark, attack humans)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shark, attack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(predator, attack)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tiger shark, attack people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(great white shark, attack humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(predator, attack)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(shark, attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tiger shark, attack people)