shark: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, fish
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, bull shark
Weight: 0.83
, great white shark
Weight: 0.79
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.76
, manta ray
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manta ray, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(shark, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(manta ray, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(manta ray, is endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bull shark, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(shark, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manta ray, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bull shark, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)