great white shark: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
is protected species 0.83
is endagered 0.78
be endangered yahoo answers 0.77
is extinct 0.76
is keystone species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(shark, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endagered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endangered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(whale shark, is endagered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endagered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(great white shark, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(great white shark, is protected species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be endangered yahoo answers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be endangered yahoo answers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(great white shark, be endangered yahoo answers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is protected species)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(great white shark, be endangered yahoo answers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(great white shark, is protected species)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is protected species)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endagered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)