tiger shark: is keystone species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is keystone species 1.00
is species 0.87
is endangered 0.76
is endangered animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(shark, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tiger, is endangered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endangered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bull shark, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is species)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bull shark, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tiger, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)