tiger shark: is endangered animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered animals 1.00
is endangered 0.93
is animals 0.89
is species 0.83
is keystone species 0.75
be called tiger sharks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(shark, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is endangered)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(tiger, is animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tiger, is animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tiger, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endangered)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bull shark, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is keystone species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is animals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is species)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is species)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be called tiger sharks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tiger shark, be called tiger sharks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, be called tiger sharks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tiger shark, be called tiger sharks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tiger, is animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bull shark, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tiger, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)