tiger shark: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
is endangered animals 0.93
is species 0.79
is keystone species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(shark, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shark, is endangered)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tiger, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tiger, is endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(great white shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(whale shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bull shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bull shark, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(great white shark, is keystone species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is keystone species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is keystone species)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(great white shark, is keystone species)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(great white shark, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(whale shark, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bull shark, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tiger, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger shark, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shark, is endangered)