shih tzu: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small dog
Weight: 0.63
, dog
Weight: 0.60
, breed
Weight: 0.57
, terrier
Weight: 0.54
, pet
Weight: 0.48
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.32
, maltese
Weight: 0.32
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.31
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.31
, great dane
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
bite tails 0.83
has physical part teeth 0.82
have curly tails 0.81
chase tails 0.79
has physical part eyes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(small dog, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(small dog, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great dane, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(great dane, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(shih tzu, bite tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, chase tails)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(shih tzu, chase tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, bite tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part teeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, have curly tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, bite tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, chase tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(shih tzu, bite tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(shih tzu, have curly tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(shih tzu, have curly tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(shih tzu, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, have curly tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(shih tzu, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shih tzu, chase tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part teeth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(great dane, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(small dog, has physical part teeth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(shih tzu, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)