shopping: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.67
, attraction
Weight: 0.65
, need
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gift shop
Weight: 0.69
, clothing store
Weight: 0.37
, hardware store
Weight: 0.35
, shoe store
Weight: 0.35
, food store
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for environment 0.80
affect water quality 0.78
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shopping, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hobby, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shopping, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food store, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food store, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(shopping, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shopping, feel good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(shopping, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(shopping, feel good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shopping, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(shopping, feel good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shopping, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality good)