short: be considered unprofessional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings long hair
Weight: 0.32
, only
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered unprofessional 1.00
is unprofessional 0.98
is inappropriate 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(long hair, is unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(long hair, is unprofessional)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(short, be considered unprofessional)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(short, is unprofessional)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(short, is unprofessional)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(short, is unprofessional)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(short, is unprofessional)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(short, is inappropriate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(short, is inappropriate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(short, is inappropriate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(short, is inappropriate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(short, be considered unprofessional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(long hair, be considered unprofessional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(short, be considered unprofessional)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(long hair, is unprofessional)