shot: be used in films

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projectile
Weight: 0.63
, photograph
Weight: 0.59
, mistake
Weight: 0.57
, story
Weight: 0.57
Siblings volley
Weight: 0.61
, forehand
Weight: 0.60
, overhead
Weight: 0.60
, blast
Weight: 0.57
, lob
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in films 1.00
be in movies 0.92
is movie 0.85
be in low budget movies 0.78
shooting on film 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mistake, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shot, be used in films)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mistake, be in movies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mistake, be in movies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mistake, be in movies)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(shot, be used in films)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(shot, be used in films)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shot, be in low budget movies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(shot, be in low budget movies)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(shot, be in low budget movies)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shot, be in low budget movies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shot, be used in films)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shot, be used in films)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mistake, be in movies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shot, be used in films)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mistake, be in movies)