shunt: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.43
, example
Weight: 0.41
, structure
Weight: 0.41
, method
Weight: 0.38
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.30
, valve
Weight: 0.30
, pacemaker
Weight: 0.30
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.30
, cooling device
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality better 0.89
has quality bad 0.87
has quality making 0.84
making quality content 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shunt, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shunt, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shunt, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(implant, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shunt, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shunt, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shunt, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(implant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(implant, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(vacuum tube, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(implant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(implant, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(shunt, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shunt, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(implant, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(implant, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pacemaker, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(shunt, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)