sidewalk: be designed with cracks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pavement
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.60
Siblings street
Weight: 0.35
, driveway
Weight: 0.35
, alley
Weight: 0.35
, plaza
Weight: 0.35
, intersection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be designed with cracks 1.00
have built in cracks 0.92
is made with cracks 0.91
have cracks 0.91
be designed with cracks between slabs 0.91
be designed funnel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be designed funnel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed funnel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed funnel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed funnel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)