sidewalk: have cracks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pavement
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.60
Siblings street
Weight: 0.35
, driveway
Weight: 0.35
, alley
Weight: 0.35
, plaza
Weight: 0.35
, intersection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cracks 1.00
is made with cracks 0.96
have built in cracks 0.95
be designed with cracks 0.91
be designed with cracks between slabs 0.85
crack 0.75
have gaps 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pavement, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have cracks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pavement, crack)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pavement, crack)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(street, crack)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pavement, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(street, crack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(street, crack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have cracks)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, crack)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have gaps)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, crack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(sidewalk, crack)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sidewalk, crack)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have gaps)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have gaps)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have gaps)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have cracks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pavement, crack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(street, crack)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(sidewalk, have cracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pavement, crack)