singer: be more famous than actors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.68
, writer
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, star
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.65
, pianist
Weight: 0.64
, sarah vaughan
Weight: 0.61
, rapper
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more famous than actors 1.00
become actors 0.90
be more open than selective singers 0.77
become singers 0.76
be more popular than females 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rapper, become actors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(rapper, become actors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rapper, become actors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(singer, become actors)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(singer, become actors)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(singer, become actors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(singer, become singers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(singer, become singers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(singer, become singers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(singer, be more popular than females)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(singer, be more popular than females)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(singer, be more popular than females)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(singer, become actors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more popular than females)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(singer, become singers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rapper, become actors)