singer: be more popular than females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.68
, writer
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, star
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.65
, pianist
Weight: 0.64
, sarah vaughan
Weight: 0.61
, rapper
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than females 1.00
be more open than selective singers 0.78
be more famous than actors 0.76
be highly popular among white community 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(singer, be more popular than females)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(singer, be highly popular among white community)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(singer, be highly popular among white community)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(singer, be highly popular among white community)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(singer, be highly popular among white community)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more popular than females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(singer, be more popular than females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(singer, be more popular than females)