skink: have blue tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lizard
Weight: 0.55
, reptile
Weight: 0.47
, name
Weight: 0.45
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, amphibian
Weight: 0.33
Siblings iguana
Weight: 0.34
, toad
Weight: 0.34
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.34
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.34
, frog
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have blue tongues 1.00
have blue tongue 0.91
has physical part tongues 0.89
have blue tails 0.82
has physical part tongue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tongues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have blue tongues)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(skink, have blue tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(skink, have blue tongue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(skink, have blue tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(skink, have blue tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(skink, have blue tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lizard, have blue tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(skink, have blue tongues)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lizard, have blue tongues)