sleeping: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.55
, need
Weight: 0.55
, function
Weight: 0.54
, necessity
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sleep
Weight: 0.34
, couch
Weight: 0.32
, nap
Weight: 0.32
, breathing
Weight: 0.32
, living
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80
be good for back 0.78
is long bad 0.78
be bad extacy 0.76
is early good 0.76
is too long bad 0.76
get better 0.76
be on bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sleep, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(nap, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(couch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(couch, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nap, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sleep, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(living, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(nap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(nap, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nap, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sleep, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sleep, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sleeping, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be good for back)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sleeping, be good for back)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be good for back)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sleeping, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be good for back)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sleeping, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sleeping, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, is early good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is early good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is early good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sleeping, is early good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sleeping, be on bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sleeping, get better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sleeping, be on bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sleeping, get better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be on bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, get better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sleeping, get better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be on bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(living, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(couch, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sleep, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nap, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nap, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nap, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sleeping, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)