sleeping: is long bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.55
, need
Weight: 0.55
, function
Weight: 0.54
, necessity
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sleep
Weight: 0.34
, couch
Weight: 0.32
, nap
Weight: 0.32
, breathing
Weight: 0.32
, living
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is long bad 1.00
is too long bad 0.93
be bad extacy 0.90
be on bad 0.89
be bad for back 0.85
is too bad 0.84
has quality bad 0.84
is late bad 0.83
be good for back 0.80
is early good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(living, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sleeping, is long bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be good for back)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sleeping, be good for back)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be good for back)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sleeping, be on bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is late bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be good for back)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is early good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is early good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, is early good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sleeping, is late bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is late bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be on bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sleeping, be on bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sleeping, is late bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sleeping, is early good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be on bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is long bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(living, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nap, has quality bad)