sloth: be at tree in jungle

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree in jungle 1.00
be at jungle tree 1.00
be at sumatra jungle 0.93
be at jungle 0.93
be at tree in rainforest 0.89
be at tropical jungle 0.89
be at jungle or desert 0.88
be at tree 0.86
be at euculiptus tree 0.86
be at south american jungle 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at jungle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tree)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at sumatra jungle)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at jungle)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(monkey, be at jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at jungle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(monkey, be at sumatra jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at sumatra jungle)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lizard, be at jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at jungle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monkey, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at jungle)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at jungle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at jungle tree)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at tree in rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sloth, be at jungle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tropical jungle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sloth, be at south american jungle)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sloth, be at jungle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree in jungle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tree)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(monkey, be at jungle)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(monkey, be at sumatra jungle)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree in jungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lizard, be at jungle)